


and b)



On one side, the difference is Friday to the following Monday or one banking day later and of course the difference is due to the fact that the governments around the world have partial nationalized their banks by pumping trillions into them. Is that really the correct cure? What about the bad assets being still on their books? What about the some 800 or so trillions of derivatives outstanding? What about a recession? What about credit card delinquencies on the rise? I could name a couple of other items that still need to be solved somehow.
Well anyway, to start with this musing, I'd like to quote Dan Norcini's comment on Monday October 13 (www.jsmineset.com)
Quote
Now that the economic crisis is firmly behind us due to the concerted action of the G7 nations over the weekend, we can all breathe a collective sigh of relief and get back to counting the soaring revenues that will soon be flooding into corporate coffers and from thence to the government ushering in a new era of wondrous prosperity. I felt so much relief this morning that I decided that we are going to start a new campaign exhorting Americans to send voluntary contributions to the Federal government as a sign of their gratitude for all the hard work and dedication it took in putting this crisis behind us in such a short time. Please make all checks payable to "sheep-sheared R Us; P O Box BlackHole; Washington, District of Cronyism.
Unquote
Putting Dan's sarcasm aside it seems that the markets loved the action.
Well dear reader during last weekend most countries decided to help their banks and agreed with nationalization or partial nationalization of their banking system. Monday stock markets started in euphoria. The important stock exchanges increased around 10%. This is, historically seen, the highest increase ever in one day. Well the question now is if the problem is really solved. Is it? Well as you imagine I have my serious doubts. Why? Well over the past months we have been told several times that the problem is solved and a few days later we had to find out that the contrary is true. With all these outstanding derivatives I do not see how the problem can be solved already. Taking AIG as an example it is, in my opinion, crystal clear that the governments will have to inject more and more liquidity into the banks and markets. Over time nobody will believe anymore that a solution is possible. So my guess is that we bought only some time. To the rescue packages a few facts. According to official numbers the money injected (or should I say invested?) into the banking system, represented until Monday October 13, USD 688.— for each human living on mother earth. Well the number will increase. Please take note that the US part is not yet included. Well anyway this is just for starters. In my humble opinion, more injections should be expected. To give you another comparison, the amount Germany will inject is equal to Germany's one year tax income.
Well the question is where these loads of money are coming from and who will pay. In England, for example, many people ask themselves how it can be possible that the government can mobilize these huge amounts in practically one day while they were not able to find the funds to maintain hospitals, or the public transport system etc. over the past years. Well without doubt a good question. Again who will pay? Will we see inflation or hyperinflation? Will we see a combination of hyperinflation and deflation? Well many scenarios are possible. However, whatever scenario will occur, somebody has to pay.
To get an idea of what happen we may look at the Iceland case and compare it with the US. Of course there might be other countries that would fit into the same comparison too.
Iceland resembles in a way a microcosm of the US Economy, that like Iceland has relied heavily on significant inflows of capital, to fuel its growth and maintain it's newly inflated lifestyle and insatiable appetite for imported goods and growing energy use.

To attract foreign capital, its Treasury and Money Markets have been viewed as a safe haven for the more conservative capital that now amounts in the Trillions and then the higher yielding appeal of the Sub-prime related investments was offered to the more racy investors around the World, wanting to make fast money.

Iceland, apparently had the same idea, that like a Ponzi scheme (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme) that is too good to be true, attracted tens of Billions of Dollars from offshore through on line savings accounts offering as much as 7% yield something a great many investors around the World viewed as a deal too good to pass up... Unfortunately, it became increasingly difficult for the Icelanders to deliver on their 7% promised yield and as early depositers began to withdraw funds, the Icelandic Kroner fell over the course of the last 9 months from 58 to the Dollar to 144 in recent days as the collapsing currency accelerated to the downside in a near freefall, as this whole mess became exposed and Iceland's Banks began collapsing one after the other, leaving investors savings in a in a mad scramble to be repatriated at any price.

Iceland's markets sold off precipitously, as the whole country had gotten pretty rich on Iceland's deregulated banking binge, were now left with deflated values,
If it were not for the Russians and Swedes coming to Iceland's rescue, the country would be in default and is technically bankrupt today, because it cannot make good on deposits, as tens of billions are totally lost...

it certainly erupted
Well dear reader does this remind you of anything? Although the US and possibly other countries too, have not reached the levels of near total insolvency similar to Iceland yet and therefore still have a currency that has not yet collapsed, we clearly can see the apparent parallels.
frost and cold weather to be expected


Well dear reader, last week I wrote about preparing or increasing food stocks. You probably thought that I might be too neurotic and maybe exaggerating. Well some of you know that I tend to sound like someone who is exaggerating from time to time. However, unfortunately, it turned out that my exaggerations proved to be true in most cases. Now it seems that my neurotic touch regarding food storing might maybe not be that neurotic at all. Icelanders rushed into the stores to buy whatever food they were able to buy. Before reading the following information piece about Icelanders, I'd like to mention the following. Having a food stock is not that bad an idea. Try to store food that can be stored up to 2 or more years. Assuming that food prices will increase further, buying food today would mean buying it at lower prices. If we are lucky and will not have to face disruptions in the food chain, we still can use our stock whenever we like. If we would have to face situations like the Icelanders have to, holding a food stock would certainly be an advantage.
Icelandic Shoppers Splurge as Currency Woes Reduce Food Imports
Oct. 13 (Bloomberg) -- After a four-year spending spree, Icelanders are flooding the supermarkets one last time, stocking up on food as the collapse of the banking system threatens to cut the island off from imports.
``We have had crazy days for a week now,' said Johannes Smari Oluffsson, manager of the Bonus discount grocery store in Reykjavik's main shopping center. ``Sales have doubled.'
Bonus, a nationwide chain, has stock at its warehouse for about two weeks. After that, the shelves will start emptying unless it can get access to foreign currency, the 22-year-old manager said, standing in a walk-in fridge filled with meat products, among the few goods on sale produced locally.

Iceland's foreign currency market has seized up after the three largest banks collapsed and the government abandoned an attempt to peg the exchange rate. Many banks won't trade the krona and suppliers from abroad are demanding payment in advance. The government has asked banks to prioritize foreign currency transactions for essentials such as food, drugs and oil….
http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aVFtDRGwcc50&refer=home
Now to opinions of others
From Adrian Douglas
Quote
Imagine a country such as Venezuela announced that it was bailing out an investment bank, then just days later said it was nationalizing its mortgage industry, and then just days later that it was bailing out its biggest insurance company, and then just days later its government pledged 700B$ to inject into its failing banks, and then just days later its stock market fell 20%. Would you feel comfortable having your money invested in such a country, in its stock market, in its bond market or in its currency?
I hope you answered “No” or “Hell, No!” to the above question! So why should you feel any different about the situation if the country is called “America”?
Many investors are starting to think that after this stock market rout and with a G7 package things will begin to improve. That is not the way things work! 20 years of excesses with even more monetary excesses about to be heaped upon us as a “rescue package” do not get unwound in 5 days. This is just the beginning. The bond market is the biggest market in the world (if we ignore the ridiculous, unregulated casino peddling OTC derivatives!). When the bond market heads south the money that has to find a safe haven somewhere else is in the trillions. Just a small percentage of this capital will blow the precious metals to unimaginable levels.
Unquote
Following Nouriel Roubini's opinion
Bloomberg (October 14, 2008) Roubini Sees Worst Recession in 40 Years, Rally's End
http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini
Well dear reader, one can try to find out what the plan behind all these movements are. I mentioned in my past musings that there are several high government people who could have a particular interest in helping particular financial institutions. Following a very interesting article from William Engdahl, exploring a bit the background of the monopoly moves.
Behind the Panic: Financial Warfare and the Future of Global Bank Power
What’s clear from the behavior of European financial markets over the past two weeks is that the dramatic stories of financial meltdown and panic are deliberately being used by certain influential factions in and outside the EU to shape the future face of global banking in the wake of the US sub-prime and Asset-Backed Security (ABS) debacle. The most interesting development in recent days has been the unified and strong position of the German Chancellor, Finance Minister, Bundesbank and coalition Government, all opposing an American-style EU Superfund bank bailout.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10495
Dominic Lawson: It all went wrong when we left the gold standard
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/dominic-lawson/dominic-lawson-it-all-went-wrong-when-we-left-the-gold-standard-960268.html
Securities Lending
Dear reader, I strongly recommend to check if you agreed to have your investments in the securities lending program of your bank or broker. If that is the case I strongly recommend canceling it immediately. What is security lending? Well if you hold investments such as stocks or bonds, with the security lending agreement you normally allow your bank or broker to lend out your shares, for certain time. The party that takes the ownership of the investments will pay a lending fee, which depends on the time the investment is lent out and depends on the respective demand. That means if there is high demand for a specific investment the fee will be higher. Your bank or broker will do the lending in their name and not in yours. Until the investment is back in your portfolio there are counterparty risks you run. Normally your bank or broker guarantees that you will get back your investment. In this case your bank or broker is the counterparty risk. That means that in this case the counterparty risk could be OK. However the additional income one can earn by participating in the securities lending programs are so insignificant that it really does not make sense to run any counterparty risk. Therefore I strongly recommend not to participate at all.
USD
Well dear reader you know that I do see the USD much lower. I mentioned as well that the USD will disappear anyway. Be it the AMERO or any other kind of currency. As I strongly believe that the USD will not exist anymore in the not too distant future, I recommend building up positions outside the US. My favorite position is precious metals. Gold and Silver should soon go up considerably. Furthermore I prefer the Swiss Franc. Short term Swiss Government bonds in Swiss Francs might be worth a consideration. Please take note that the net interest paid out by these bonds is low. However in a crisis interest payment normally is not the most important factor. More important is certainly the safety of the investments.
In that sense I like to mention that losing an opportunity costs a lot less than losing real money due to an investment that went sour. Therefore when risks are high, I prefer to be on the sideline in a conservative investment and thus maybe running the risk to lose an opportunity to earn nice profits.
Well dear reader lots of things are not OK these days. Following an interesting link to an essay of Jim Willie. He has his particular way of saying what he thinks. In my opinion it is an excellent read. Of course, as always, he can be right or not. Maybe he is too much on the conspiracy side. However, as there is a lot we might not understand going on, some of what Jim writes might be true. Please read on
http://www.321gold.com/editorials/willie/willie100908.html
On the following link you can find an excellent explanation why the USD increased over the past weeks
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2008/10/short-term-imbalance-in-dollar-assets.html
Equity

Enrico Orlandini at www.dtanalysis.com has the following comments
If the market continues to fall, I think there will be ramifications that very few could
have anticipated. The current administration must find someone to blame, and soon,
before the rest of the world blames the US, and American citizens catch on to the
truth. Americans have avoided the truth for three decades, since the Kennedys were
killed, and the awakening is always painful. I believe that Bush will soon become
desperate and will take desperate measures. Here’s one possible scenario:
-McCain is out of the White House; when the Democrats come in, they will
start a witch hunt with Bush republicans as the target.
-Paulson has already stated that he’ll use the money for purposes other than
what he outlined to Congress.
-The market doesn’t like any of this and will have a drop of 1,000 points or
more, one day soon.
-This will mysteriously coincide with some event in the Middle East, or the US,
and will require an escalation of the war.
-Bush will suspend the US Constitution stating that there is a real threat to the
US and he will rule by Martial Law, thereby annulling the November election,
should it even occur before.
I know this sounds extreme, but we are passing through uncharted territory and you
can throw the book away. Your ability to project accurately will be put to the test.
When you see the type of volatility that we are seeing now, it is an indication that real
problems are just below the surface and may just see the light of day.
and his statistic
Morgan Stanley
Well dear reader on Monday I prepared the following information about Morgan Stanley. On Tuesday it was already old news as the US Government decided to part nationalize (or invest) in banks too. Morgan Stanley is amongst those banks that receive money and the government as shareholder. Morgan Stanley would have had enormous problems to get the needed money to survive. Now at least they can breathe again for a couple of weeks.
Following the old piece of information:
Now Morgan Stanley Needs "$60 Billion" Of New Equity
Henry Blodget
Oct 11, 08 7:32 AM
A few days ago, Morgan Stanley was apparently well-capitalized. Then rating agency Egan-Jones said the firm needed $30 billion of new equity. Then Moody's threatened a downgrade. Then the $10 billion Mitsubishi deal seemed ready to fall apart. Now Egan-Jones says Morgan Stanley needs $60 billion.
So what's the real number? Or, more pertinently, what will it be on Monday morning, when Morgan Stanley tries to reopen for business? God only knows.
In any event, Hank Paulson had better get ready to write one hell of a massive check.
Morgan Stanley's current market cap, by the way, is only about $11 billion. So, by all rights, Mitsubishi's $10 billion should buy it one half of the firm (instead of the one-quarter that Mitsubishi agreed to).
If Egan-Jones first estimate of $30 billion is right, Hank will have to write a $20 billion check and Morgan Stanley's current shareholders will end up with one-quarter of their firm. If Egan-Jones's new estimate is right, Hank will have to write a $50 billion check, and Morgan Stanley's current shareholders will end up with 16% of the firm. And that's if the Mitsubishi deal goes through and Hank doesn't demand warrants and a huge preferred dividend for his trouble, which, by all rights, he should.
More about Morgan Stanley
Found on www.lemetropolecafe.com (once again I strongly recommend to subscribe to the service. It cost you less than 200 Dollars per year and you get excellent information on a daily basis. In case there are certain parts that are difficult to understand, please let me know and I will try to clarify it)
Quote
The REAL number that Morgan Stanley needs? Morgan Stanley is a walking corpse being kept alive by the hope of a Treasury bailout that will cost $100's of billions.
I just did a cursory anlaysis of MS's balance sheet. "Cursory" because their disclosure sucks. But here's a breakdown as per their latest 10-Q:
http://www.morganstanley.com/about/ir/shareholder/10q0808/10q0808.pdf
They report $420 billion in short term assets and $372 billion in long term investments. Of that:
We have no idea what a detailed breakdown of most of the $372 in long term investments look like, but I'm guessing Mitsubishi looked at it and ran. It's probably safe to assume - and I'll ignore the short term investments but rest assured its less than where they carry it. Let's assume the long term stuff needs a 30% markdown. That would be quite generous based on what we're seeing with Lehman's liquidation. A 30% markdown means Morgan Stanley has a $111 biilon asset deficit just with the on-balance-sheet assets. They have a book value of $36 billion. So the net black hole on balance sheet is NEGATIVE $75 billion.
Check out the off-balance sheet disclosures:
$217 billion in commercial and resi mortgage assets that were transferred off balance sheet because the assessed risk exposure via credit default swaps and other accountning mechanisms was deemed minimal according to GAAP. As we've seen, starting with Enron and moving forward, that's a really bad assumption.
They also have $6 trillion in "nominal" derivatives exposure. As we've come to see, "notional" becomes "actual" when there is counter-party default. Lehman, Bear and AIG are terrific examples of $100's of billions of counterparty default exposure.
So, is $60 billion enough capital for Morgan Stanley? Looks to me like it's low by several multiples. I'm sure that's why Paulson is looking at nationalizing Morgan Stanley. Does anyone really want their tax money being used to keep Morgan Stanley alive. Just think about your tax money being used to pay huge bonuses to Morgan Stanley employees in a couple months.
And guess what? I assure you that Goldman Sachs in right in line behind Morgan Stanley looking for a bailout and I'm sure that's why both of them received the rushed approval by the Fed of bank holding company status.
This is going to cost taxpayers trillions.
Unquote
Derivatives
Dear reader I have been warning about derivatives for a couple of times now. Although it might sound like a rotten disk, some more about this topic. Please read the following article which should show you the extend of the possible problem
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/a-163516-trillion-derivatives-timebomb-958699.html
Oil

Byron King believes that Oil could drop under USD 70 per barrel. He thinks that we could even see USD 65 over the next 2 months.
He believes that prices will fall due to the world wide recession that is in it's beginning phase.
Byron believes that we will be in the USD 80s/90s for up to 12 months. After the 12 months he sees much higher prices.
Well dear reader, we are already close to USD 70 per barrel. If oil prices will stay at this level for some time, it will mean that there is no rush to search new reserves. Being at Peak, as I believe, low oil prices will only lead to much higher prices later on. Low oil prices lead to postpone important projects into the future. Important projects that should be started now as we will need the effects in the not too distant future.
Investment wise, I think that one can consider to start building up positions in oil and natural gas. Although it seems that there is no need to rush into it, maybe starting slowly should do fine.
Gold

Gold and silver prices reach a major tipping point
In an unprecedented move last week, central banks practically stopped
lending gold to banks and other participants in the precious metals market.
Last week the one-month gold lease rate rocketed to 2.6%, the highest since May 2001 and way
above its five-year average of 0.12%, according to the London Bullion Market Association.
A major turning point for gold and silver prices is at hand.
Gold and silver went through a severe correction this summer just like the correction in 1975.
Please read this excellent article on below link
http://www.ameinfo.com/171121.html
Well dear reader you certainly agree with me that gold should have gone up considerably during the last days. Please do not forget that the Central Banks and the PPT or with the official wording, The Presidents Working Group for financial Markets, does everything to control a substantial rise in the gold price because this would show everybody that the FIAT currency (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_currency) experiment is dead. So it should not come as a surprise that we do not yet see the rise I expect. Well we know now that they will do whatever they can to control the mess (Paulson himself said this), we have to be ready for any surprise attack. Doing whatever they can could even mean a confiscation of Gold. We will see. Well anyway, Gold is insurance against bailouts, busted banks, money market funds like Reserve Funds which have missed their promised payback, conflagration in the OTC credit default and other varieties of credit derivatives, enormous and unprecedented flood of newly and electronically created US dollars everywhere.






